Oleksandr Kyryllov

Fractional CRM & Lifecycle Architect · 14 years · ex-Uber Eats EMEA

More revenue from the customers you already have.

Campaigns go out, but it is hard to tell what to change next. I take ownership of the CRM and lifecycle system — economics, architecture, behaviour — and measure each gain against a holdout wherever the volume allows.

In the Uber Eats EMEA team I contributed to CRM for ~250,000 merchants across 17 countries.

Retainers €2,500–€14,000/mo →Hiring for a role? →

He combines deep CRM systems expertise with a very pragmatic, business-first mindset.
Director of Marketing Technology · Uber

Built lifecycle & MarTech systems at

DOC.UA apteka24 Ning Interactive

The work so far

What I moved at Uber.

Every number here opens its own ⓘ — how it was measured, and what it does not claim.

Scope of ownership
UberEats

The Uber Eats merchant CRM layer in EMEA — owned end to end.

Every merchant message Uber Eats sent in EMEA — 2M a month, 8 languages — ran through systems I owned. Strategy, SQL, templates, deliverability, experimentation — the whole chain.

250,000

businesses under CRM ownership

Markets
17 countries
Languages
8
Comms
2M/mo
Automations
~2,000
Tempo
30–50 campaigns/wk
Cross-org bridge
5 teams
Lifecycle uplift
+49%

CTR uplift across core EMEA lifecycle. 1.53% → 2.28% via systematic A/B testing, AMPscript fixes, AI personalization.

How this is measured

1.53% → 2.28% click-through across the core EMEA lifecycle portfolio — a portfolio-wide shift, not one hero campaign. Source: SFMC reporting, with holdout groups wherever volume allowed a clean control.

Deliverability
95%+

Diagnosed and fixed a global SFMC defect — took deliverability from ~84% to 95%+ worldwide, not just EMEA. How I found it →

How this is measured

~84% → 95%+ delivered, verified in raw delivery logs. Root cause was a platform-level SFMC defect I diagnosed and escalated; the fix shipped worldwide, so every Uber market benefits — not just mine.

Where to start

Small first. Deeper only if it pays.

Prices are public and flat. Each step is useful on its own, and you can stop after any of them.

  1. 01 · Outside€600

    Lifecycle Teardown →

    Five business days, zero calls. I walk what is visible from the outside and show where the lifecycle tears.

    Credited against the Diagnostic within 60 days.

  2. 02 · Inside€2,900

    Diagnostic →

    Two weeks inside your stack. An executive map of what leaks revenue and a 90-day operating plan — yours to keep either way.

  3. 03 · Ongoingfrom €2,500/mo

    Retainer →

    Ownership of the system as the work continues. Three months first, then month to month.

    • Advisor€2,500/mo
    • Embedded Architect€6,500/mo
    • Fractional Lead€14,000/mo

See the tiers →

How the work runs

Four things I keep.

  • 01Start

    Three months first. Then month to month. A lifecycle system needs one full cycle before its numbers mean anything.

  • 02Proof

    A holdout wherever the volume allows. Each gain is read against a control group, not against last month’s report.

  • 03Focus

    No more than three clients. Each system I take on gets a real owner, not a share of a crowded calendar.

  • 04Scope

    What I don’t do. Paid acquisition, greenfield CRM builds, production-volume QA. If that is the need, I’ll point you somewhere good. Who I can’t help →

If the model fits,let’s talk.

30 minutes, video, no agenda template. I want to understand where revenue is leaking: data, lifecycle, governance, tooling, or ownership. If the problem fits my shape, we agree on Diagnostic or retainer next steps in the same call. If it doesn’t, I’ll say so.